Passage Summary: Newspaper editors think they are being rebellious by printing anti-environment articles, but the author thinks they are wrong because being pro-environment isn't actually the 'standard' view they think it is.

Reasoning: Editors publish antienvironmental articles because they want to appear daring by challenging orthodoxy, but the author claims environmentalism is not actually the orthodoxy.

Analysis: The commentator is pointing out a delusion held by newspaper editors. The editors' motivation is to be 'daring' by attacking what they perceive as a dominant political position. However, if the author is right that environmentalism is not actually the dominant position, then the editors are failing to be truly daring in the way they intend. We should look for an answer that synthesizes these facts, likely suggesting that the editors are mistaken about the political status of the views they are publishing.