Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A gardener argues that because nature has many different-looking rocks, Japanese gardens—which are supposed to match nature—should also use a wide variety of rocks.

Conclusion: Rocks selected for Japanese gardens should have a wide variety of appearances.

Reasoning: These gardens are intended to harmonize with nature, and rocks in the natural world exhibit a wide variety of appearances.

Analysis: The gardener is making a leap from a general goal (harmony) to a specific aesthetic requirement (variety). This argument relies on the assumption that 'harmony with nature' is achieved by replicating the specific diversity found in nature. To find the necessary assumption, look for a statement that connects the concept of harmony to the requirement of mirroring nature's variety; if harmony didn't require variety, the gardener's logic would fall apart.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

The gardener's argument depends on assuming which one of the following?

Correct Answer
B
B connects the premise to the conclusion: in rock selection, imitation of nature helps achieve harmony with nature. Negation test: if imitating nature in rock selection does not help achieve harmony, then the fact that natural rocks vary gives no reason to vary the garden’s rocks; the conclusion collapses. So B is necessary.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep