Passage Summary: Waller thinks if psychics were real, they'd be famous and everyone would believe in them; Chin thinks even if they were real, the media and experts would keep the public from believing it.

Reasoning: Waller believes ESP would be publicly accepted if it were real because it could be demonstrated; Chin believes public opinion is kept biased by skeptical elites and media.

Analysis: This is a Point at Issue question, so we need a statement that one person would agree with and the other would disagree with. Waller asserts that a clear demonstration of ESP *would* lead to public acceptance and renown. Chin counters that it is *impossible* to satisfy skeptics and that media bias would prevent public acceptance. The core of their disagreement is whether a demonstration of ESP would actually result in the general public accepting its existence. Use the 'Agree/Disagree' test on each answer choice to ensure both speakers have a clear, opposing stance.