Must be TrueDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: In this town, most shops have birds, and many of those have fish too. If a shop has fish but no birds, it definitely has gerbils. Also, none of the independent shops carry gerbils.

Reasoning: Most pet stores sell exotic birds; most of those also sell tropical fish. Stores with fish but no birds must sell gerbils. No independent stores sell gerbils.

Analysis: This is a Must Be True question involving formal logic and overlapping groups. We know that 'Fish + No Birds = Gerbils.' We also know 'Independent = No Gerbils.' By taking the contrapositive of the first rule, we see that 'No Gerbils = No Fish OR Birds.' Combining these, if an independent store sells tropical fish, it cannot be in the 'No Birds' category because that would require it to sell gerbils. Therefore, any independent store selling tropical fish must also sell exotic birds. Look for a synthesis of these conditional chains.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

19.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true?

Correct Answer
D
From (T and not E) -> G and G -> not I, we infer that an independently owned store cannot be T and not E. So no independently owned pet store in West Calverton sells tropical fish but not exotic birds.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep