Point at IssueDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Price thinks a company's main duty is to the people who invest money in it. Albrecht disagrees, arguing that the main duty is to the employees whose lives depend on their jobs.

Reasoning: Price argues that shareholders take the biggest financial risk and should be the priority, while Albrecht argues that employees' livelihoods are at stake, making them the priority.

Analysis: This is a classic 'Point at Issue' structure where two speakers disagree on a value judgment. To find the right answer, apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test: Price would say 'Yes' to the idea that shareholders are the primary concern, while Albrecht would say 'No.' The core of their conflict is the definition of 'primary responsibility.' Focus strictly on this hierarchy of importance rather than the specific reasons (risk vs. livelihood) they use to justify their positions.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

On the basis of their statements, Price and Albrecht are committed to disagreeing about whether

Correct Answer
D
Price’s rationale commits him to saying shareholders have the most at stake; Albrecht’s diversification vs. livelihood point commits him to denying that. So they are committed to disagreeing on D.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep