StrengthenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: There's a line of craters that could be from space rocks or volcanoes. Since they are in a line, they probably all have the same cause. Because they happened at different times, the author thinks they are volcanic.

Conclusion: The craters were likely created by volcanic activity rather than by meteorites.

Reasoning: The craters are in a straight line, which suggests a single type of cause, and they were formed at different times.

Analysis: The author is using the 'different ages' of the craters to rule out meteorites. This assumes that a string of meteorites would likely hit all at once, whereas volcanic activity can occur along a line over a long period. To strengthen this, we need an answer that confirms this distinction. Look for information suggesting that meteorites hitting the same spot at vastly different times is extremely improbable, or that volcanic vents frequently erupt in sequence over many years.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

23.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

Correct Answer
B
B directly supports the key assumption: eight meteorite craters of different ages forming a straight line is not a likely result of any known natural cause. That makes the meteoritic explanation implausible given the observed linearity and differing ages, thus strengthening the argument for volcanism.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep