Passage Summary: Otis thinks dentists shouldn't give friends special treatment because everyone should be treated the same. Tyra thinks it's fine because that's just what being a friend means, and it doesn't violate justice.

Conclusion: Otis believes it is unjust for a dentist to provide special scheduling for a friend, while Tyra believes such actions are not unjust.

Reasoning: Otis bases his view on Aristotle's principle that similar cases should be treated similarly. Tyra accepts the principle but argues that friendship inherently involves special favors and that acting on this human nature is not an injustice.

Analysis: This is a Point at Issue question, so we apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test. Otis explicitly states that favoring a friend is 'wrong' based on his application of Aristotle's principle. Tyra, while agreeing with the principle in theory, explicitly states 'It's not unjust' for dentists to do exactly what Otis condemned. Look for an answer choice that captures this specific disagreement over whether the dentist's behavior constitutes an injustice.