Point at IssueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Pat thinks you can get really close to people online because you can be yourself behind a screen. Amar disagrees, saying that true closeness requires meeting in person and building a real bond.

Reasoning: Pat claims email allows for quick intimacy because anonymity removes social barriers. Amar counters that intimacy requires social bonds and direct personal contact, which email lacks.

Analysis: To find the point at issue, we use the 'Agree/Disagree' test. Pat explicitly states that email 'promotes a degree of intimacy.' Amar explicitly states that 'social bonds cannot be formed without direct personal contact' and that 'frankness is not intimacy.' Therefore, the core of their disagreement is whether it is possible to achieve genuine intimacy through a medium like email that lacks face-to-face interaction. Look for an answer choice that captures this specific conflict regarding the possibility of online intimacy.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

The dialogue most strongly supports the claim that Pat and Amar disagree with each other about whether

Correct Answer
C
Pat asserts intimacy can arise via e-mail; Amar denies intimacy without direct contact. So they disagree about whether intimacy between people who communicate solely by e-mail is possible.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep