Point at IssueDiff: Easy
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Aaron thinks a judge was out of line for publicly bashing unprepared lawyers, but Belinda thinks the judge was doing the right thing by being honest.
Reasoning: Aaron believes the judge's public criticism is irresponsible, while Belinda argues that being honest about the harm caused by negligence is actually a responsible act.
Analysis: To find the point at issue, we apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test. Aaron explicitly calls the judge's remarks 'irresponsible,' whereas Belinda explicitly calls that same behavior 'responsible.' Therefore, the core of their disagreement is whether the judge's public criticism of the lawyers constitutes responsible or irresponsible behavior.
Reasoning: Aaron believes the judge's public criticism is irresponsible, while Belinda argues that being honest about the harm caused by negligence is actually a responsible act.
Analysis: To find the point at issue, we apply the 'Agree/Disagree' test. Aaron explicitly calls the judge's remarks 'irresponsible,' whereas Belinda explicitly calls that same behavior 'responsible.' Therefore, the core of their disagreement is whether the judge's public criticism of the lawyers constitutes responsible or irresponsible behavior.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage4.The point at issue between Aaron and Belinda is whether
Correct Answer
B
B states precisely the proposition they dispute: whether the judge’s criticism is irresponsible. Aaron says it is; Belinda says it is not.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal