Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Scientists found tiny plant bits on old ape teeth and decided that because they only found a few types of plants there, those must have been the only things the apes ate.

Conclusion: The extinct great ape species ate only the specific plant species whose phytoliths were found on their fossilized teeth.

Reasoning: Microscopic plant remains from only a few specific plant types were discovered on the fossilized teeth of these apes.

Analysis: The argument makes a massive leap from 'what was preserved' to 'what was eaten.' It assumes that if an ape ate a plant, that plant must have left behind phytoliths that survived for millions of years. Look for an answer that addresses this preservation gap—specifically, that other plants the apes might have eaten wouldn't have left different phytoliths or that these are the only ones that could have existed. The argument fails if it turns out that many plants simply don't leave these microscopic remains behind.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

26.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

Correct Answer
B
B supplies the needed bridge: every type of plant eaten left phytoliths on the teeth. Negation test: If some eaten plants did not leave phytoliths, then finding only certain phytoliths would not justify concluding the diet consisted only of those plants; the argument collapses. So B is necessary.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep