WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Sports foods are basically just overpriced versions of regular food. Since they don't offer better nutrition, the only reason anyone would buy them is because of expensive marketing campaigns.

Conclusion: Advertising is the primary reason athletes purchase expensive specialty sports foods.

Reasoning: Specialty sports foods contain the same nutrients as common grocery store foods but cost two to three times as much.

Analysis: The author assumes that because the nutritional content is the same, there is no 'rational' reason to buy sports foods other than being swayed by ads. To weaken this, we need to find another practical benefit of sports foods that justifies the price. For example, maybe sports foods are much more portable, have a longer shelf life, or are easier to consume while running than regular food. Look for an answer that provides a non-advertising reason why an athlete would find these products valuable.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

Correct Answer
C
Saying sports foods are easier to carry and consume during training/competition provides a non-advertising reason to buy them. That undercuts the claim that, but for expensive ads, very few athletes would purchase them; convenience can justify paying more despite identical nutrients.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep