Passage Summary: Ariel thinks government money makes artists play it safe, while Sasha thinks that in a democracy, government money actually helps artists be bold and independent.

Reasoning: Ariel claims that government subsidies prevent art from challenging society because artists won't bite the hand that feeds them; Sasha argues that democratic governments actually encourage such challenges and subsidies allow for artistic freedom.

Analysis: When applying the 'Agree/Disagree' test, we see both speakers agree that art's role is to challenge society's values. Their point of contention is the effect of government funding on that role. Ariel believes it is impossible to challenge the institution providing the funding, while Sasha believes democratic institutions specifically facilitate that challenge. Look for an answer choice that asks whether government subsidies in a democratic society actually hinder an artist's ability to be subversive.