Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Fishermen are blaming chemical companies for fish with weird fins because the chemicals dumped years ago are known to cause mutations.

Conclusion: The fin deformities in the local cod population were definitely caused by the chemical waste dumped into the bay.

Reasoning: Chemicals were dumped in the bay, those chemicals are known to cause genetic mutations, and a small percentage of the fish now have mutated fins.

Analysis: This argument establishes a correlation and a possible mechanism, but it fails to rule out other explanations. To evaluate the claim, we need to know if these deformities occur naturally or if other pollutants are present. Since this is an 'EXCEPT' question, look for the one answer choice that provides information irrelevant to the causal link between the specific chemicals and the specific fin deformities. We want to know if the chemicals *actually* did it, not just that they *could* have.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

The answer to each of the following questions would be helpful in evaluating the representatives' claim EXCEPT:

Correct Answer
C
C is about human health effects from consuming deformed fish, which does not help determine whether chemicals caused the fish deformities.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep