Passage Summary: Two people are debating why jazz musicians changed old songs: one thinks they did it because they were bored with the originals, while the other thinks they did it because they respected the music's potential.

Reasoning: Pettengill claims bebop musicians reshaped classics out of distaste, while Romney claims they did so because they recognized the songs' depth and versatility.

Analysis: To identify the point at issue, we need to find the specific claim where one person says 'yes' and the other says 'no.' Both speakers agree that bebop musicians radically reshaped the classics, so the disagreement isn't about the action itself. Instead, the conflict lies entirely in the musicians' underlying motivation and their attitude toward the original material. Pettengill sees the musicians as critics of the old style, whereas Romney sees them as admirers. Look for an answer choice that highlights this clash over the musicians' intent or their regard for the songs they were altering.