Passage Summary: Lorraine believes that because regular people don't know enough about international relations, letting them vote on foreign policy would be a total catastrophe.

Conclusion: Holding referenda on foreign-policy issues would result in a foreign-policy disaster.

Reasoning: Unlike government officials, the general public is either unable or unwilling to become properly informed about foreign-policy matters.

Analysis: To support Lorraine, we need to strengthen the link between a lack of public knowledge and the occurrence of a 'disaster.' The argument assumes that being uninformed is a direct precursor to making catastrophic decisions. Look for an answer that provides evidence of this connection—perhaps by showing that foreign policy requires a level of expertise that only government insiders possess, or by providing an example where public ignorance led to a failed policy. We want to confirm that the public's lack of information is both real and dangerous.