Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A mother is upset that her son lost recess for something he didn't do; the principal responds by saying it's just like being stuck in traffic because of someone else's car accident.

Reasoning: The principal compares the situation of innocent students losing recess to that of drivers stuck in a traffic jam caused by an accident they did not cause.

Analysis: In this 'Most Strongly Supported' task, we are looking for a belief that the principal must hold given their choice of analogy. By comparing a school's disciplinary action to a traffic jam, the principal implies that some negative consequences are simply unavoidable for bystanders. You should look for an answer choice that suggests the principal believes it is sometimes acceptable for innocent people to suffer due to the actions of others. It’s the classic 'collateral damage' defense, delivered with the warmth of a cold radiator.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

If the principal is speaking sincerely, then it can be inferred from what the principal says that the principal believes that

Correct Answer
B
The principal’s analogy explicitly acknowledges that some people who are not involved still suffer; mapping that to the class context implies he accepts that Ms. Smith’s son might not have thrown raisins yet still had to lose recess.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep