StrengthenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: After a big quake in California, local students started dreaming about it, but students in Canada didn't, leading researchers to conclude the experience caused the dreams.

Conclusion: Experiencing an earthquake is the direct cause of people having dreams about earthquakes.

Reasoning: Students who lived through a California earthquake reported such dreams, while a control group in Ontario who did not experience the quake had almost no earthquake dreams.

Analysis: This is a classic causal argument based on a comparison between two groups, but it has a significant chronological gap. To strengthen this claim, we need to ensure that the 'cause' (the earthquake) actually led to a change in the 'effect' (the dreams). Look for an answer that establishes a baseline, such as evidence that the California students weren't already dreaming about earthquakes before the event happened. By ruling out the possibility that these students were predisposed to such dreams regardless of the quake, the causal link becomes much more robust.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

Correct Answer
A
It establishes a comparable baseline: before the quake, California students were no more likely than Ontario students to report earthquake dreams. That isolates the quake experience as the key difference and strengthens the idea that experiencing the quake caused the increase in earthquake-themed dreams.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep