Point at IssueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Two people are debating whether their office should spend the money and time to switch to a new computer system.

Reasoning: Naima argues for immediate conversion based on long-term efficiency, while Nakai argues against it based on the immediate costs outweighing the benefits.

Analysis: When identifying the point at issue, we look for the specific claim that one person affirms and the other denies. Naima concludes that the conversion should happen 'as soon as possible,' while Nakai explicitly states they should 'keep the current system for as long as we can.' Their disagreement is centered on the practical recommendation of whether to proceed with the system upgrade. Use the 'Agree/Disagree' test: Naima would say 'Yes' to the conversion, and Nakai would say 'No.'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Naima and Nakai disagree with each other over whether

Correct Answer
E
Option E states the actionable disagreement: whether the conversion should be delayed. Naima argues to convert as soon as possible (no delay), while Nakai argues to keep the current system as long as possible (delay), so they directly disagree.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep