Must be TrueDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: To make bridges strong, you have to drive poles deep into the ground. In the 1500s and 1600s, builders stopped when the poles wouldn't go any further, and we have a specific record of what that meant for a famous bridge in Venice.

Reasoning: The strength of bridge piers depends on how deep the support poles are driven; before 1700, the standard was to drive them until they could go no further, which in one 1588 case was defined as moving less than two inches after twenty-four strikes.

Analysis: Since this is a 'Must be True' question, we are looking for a statement that is a direct logical consequence of the provided facts. The stimulus defines 'refusal' as the point where pilings won't go deeper, but then provides a specific 1588 example where 'refusal' actually allowed for up to two inches of movement. This suggests that the historical definition of 'refusal' was a practical threshold rather than a literal cessation of all movement. Look for an answer that synthesizes these technical details without introducing outside information about modern engineering.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

Which one of the following can properly be inferred from the passage?

Correct Answer
E
E follows from the operational definition of “refusal”: since up to two inches of penetration still occurred after twenty-four blows, nothing rules out the possibility of additional depth with more blows or different techniques.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep