Passage Summary: You can't just use big ideas like 'justice' to decide exactly how a law should work, because different places with the same big ideas still come up with different laws.

Conclusion: Broad principles of justice are insufficient on their own to dictate the specific details of a state's social policies.

Reasoning: Even when different communities share the same core values like dignity and equality, they still end up creating different rules for things like elderly care.

Analysis: The argument rests on the observation that identical principles (dignity and equality) lead to different outcomes (elderly care provisions). To strengthen this, look for an answer that confirms these differences are actually necessary or that the principles themselves are intentionally broad. We want to bolster the idea that 'the way we do things'—local tradition or culture—is a required ingredient that the general principles simply don't provide.