Must be FalseDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A critic discusses a specific, sad piece by Bach, noting it reflects the text it's based on rather than Bach's own mood, because true master artists like Bach never use their work to vent their personal emotions.

Reasoning: The critic establishes that master artists never create to express their own feelings and explicitly identifies Bach as a master artist.

Analysis: In 'Must be False' questions, we are looking for a direct contradiction of the established rules. The strongest rule provided is a universal negative: master artists *never* create to express their own feelings. Combined with the fact that Bach *is* a master artist, we can conclude with absolute certainty that Bach never created a work to express his own feelings. Therefore, any answer choice claiming that Bach did, in fact, create a piece of music to express his personal emotions must be the false statement we are looking for.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

If the critic's statements are true, then on the basis of them which one of the following CANNOT be true?

Correct Answer
C
C directly contradicts the principle that master artists (and thus Bach) never create in order to express their own feelings. If Bach wrote other compositions in order to express his feelings, that would violate the critic’s universal rule.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep