Point at IssueDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Wirth argues that since scientists can't find a specific gene for manic-depression, the condition isn't genetic; Chang counters that it could be caused by multiple genes working together rather than just one.

Conclusion: Claims of a genetic predisposition to manic-depression are incorrect because no single gene for the condition has been identified.

Reasoning: Researchers have failed to find a specific 'manic-depression gene,' and most experts now agree such a single gene does not exist.

Analysis: To find the point at issue, we apply the Agree/Disagree Test to the central claim. Wirth concludes that the lack of a single gene proves there is no genetic predisposition at all. Chang explicitly disputes this conclusion, pointing out that a predisposition could arise from a complex interaction of several genes. Therefore, the disagreement centers on whether the absence of a single gene justifies the claim that no genetic predisposition exists. Look for an answer choice that focuses on whether a genetic predisposition to manic-depression actually exists.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

The point at issue between Wirth and Chang is whether

Correct Answer
D
D captures the exact dispute: whether current research supports the claim that no one is genetically predisposed to manic-depression. Wirth’s reasoning implies “yes,” while Chang explicitly says “no,” citing polygenic evidence.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep