Necessary AssumptionDiff: Hardest
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: Deeply plowing the soil is much worse for erosion than not plowing at all. Because of this, the author thinks farmers should stop deep plowing and use different ways to get air into the soil instead.
Conclusion: Farmers who currently use deep tillage should attempt to switch to no-till methods by adopting alternative aeration techniques.
Reasoning: Deep tillage results in ten times more topsoil erosion than no-till methods, making it significantly more harmful to the environment than previously thought.
Analysis: The author makes a leap from a problem (erosion) to a specific solution (alternative aeration techniques). For this recommendation to be sound, the author must assume that these alternative techniques are actually viable for the farmers in question. If those other techniques were impossible to implement or caused even worse problems, the advice to switch would fall apart. Look for an answer that confirms these alternative methods are a realistic option for these farmers.
Conclusion: Farmers who currently use deep tillage should attempt to switch to no-till methods by adopting alternative aeration techniques.
Reasoning: Deep tillage results in ten times more topsoil erosion than no-till methods, making it significantly more harmful to the environment than previously thought.
Analysis: The author makes a leap from a problem (erosion) to a specific solution (alternative aeration techniques). For this recommendation to be sound, the author must assume that these alternative techniques are actually viable for the farmers in question. If those other techniques were impossible to implement or caused even worse problems, the advice to switch would fall apart. Look for an answer that confirms these alternative methods are a realistic option for these farmers.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage23.The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
Correct Answer
C
C is necessary for the strong recommendation. If tilling by some other, non-deep method were viable, the data comparing deep till to no-till would not by itself make it clear that farmers should incorporate no-till specifically; perhaps a reduced-till method would suffice. Negation test: If another tilling method is viable, the argument’s ‘make it clear’ conclusion is undermined.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal