Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some companies want to keep selling phones and fax machines to a repressive country, claiming that if the citizens have access to these tools, the government won't be able to stay in power.

Conclusion: Telecommunication equipment exports should be exempt from the trade ban intended to reduce repression in Country S.

Reasoning: The manufacturers argue that widespread availability of telecommunication equipment makes it impossible for a government to maintain a repressive regime.

Analysis: The manufacturers' argument relies on a significant logical gap: the transition from 'exporting equipment' to that equipment being 'widely available to the population.' If the repressive government simply intercepts the shipments for its own use, the manufacturers' justification vanishes. We are looking for a necessary assumption that ensures the equipment actually reaches the hands of the people. This is a classic case of a corporate interest masquerading as a democratic solution, so be skeptical of the link between the sale and the social outcome.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument given by the manufacturers depends?

Correct Answer
B
B is necessary. If the equipment would be available solely to top officials, then it would not be “widely available to the population,” so the manufacturers’ key premise wouldn’t apply. Negation test: if the equipment is only for top officials, the argument no longer supports an exemption; therefore this assumption is required.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep