Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: People say Linsey is a bad songwriter because her lyrics are messy and personal. However, we call novelists 'good' even when they write in that exact same messy and personal way, so the criticism of Linsey seems unfair.

Conclusion: The claim that Linsey is a poor songwriter based on her disjointed and subjective lyrics is unjustified.

Reasoning: Many modern novelists are considered excellent writers despite their work also being characterized as disjointed and subjective.

Analysis: The author is attempting to use an analogy to defend Linsey, but they are comparing two different artistic mediums. To make this argument hold water, the author must assume that the standards for what makes a 'good' novelist are the same as those for a 'good' songwriter. If songwriting requires a specific type of clarity that novels do not, the comparison fails. Look for an answer that bridges this gap by suggesting that disjointedness shouldn't be a dealbreaker in songwriting if it isn't one in literature.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Correct Answer
A
A supplies the crucial comparability. Negation test: if disjointed and subjective writing does not have comparable effects in novels and songs, then novelists being good writers despite that style tells us little about whether songwriters can be good; the author’s rebuttal collapses.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep