Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Insurance data shows that people at a 'standard' weight live longer, so the author thinks that if you just change your weight to fit that range, you'll live longer too.

Conclusion: Individuals can increase their life expectancy by adjusting their weight to fall within the standard ranges identified by insurance companies.

Reasoning: Data shows that policyholders whose weights were within the standard range for their height lived longer than those whose weights were outside that range.

Analysis: The argument assumes that weight is the primary driver of longevity rather than just a correlate of it. For this conclusion to hold, it must be true that the act of modifying weight actually produces the health benefit, rather than weight being a side effect of a healthy lifestyle or genetics. We are looking for a 'gap' where the author assumes that moving the needle on the scale will automatically move the needle on the lifespan. A necessary assumption would be that the weight deviation itself is what causes the shorter life, not some underlying disease that makes weight modification irrelevant.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

Correct Answer
E
Correct. Negation test: If people’s efforts to modify their weight to the given range did damage their health enough to decrease life expectancy, then moving into the range would not improve life expectancy—destroying the argument. So this assumption is necessary.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep