WeakenDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: If you want people to believe you, try pointing out the flaws in your own argument first; it makes you look honest. Therefore, politicians should use this trick to get elected.

Conclusion: Candidates running for national political office should start their speeches by briefly arguing against their own positions to help them win votes.

Reasoning: This specific rhetorical technique makes a speaker appear more trustworthy and fair-minded, which audiences generally find more convincing.

Analysis: The argument assumes that what works for a general 'speaker' will work just as effectively for a national politician. To weaken this, we should look for a reason why this specific group—politicians—might face unique risks with this strategy. Perhaps voters in a high-stakes national election view 'fair-mindedness' as a sign of weakness or flip-flopping rather than a sign of integrity. If the strategy actually makes a candidate look indecisive to their base, it would certainly limit its effectiveness in winning an election.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously limits the effectiveness of adopting the argument's recommendation?

Correct Answer
A
If candidates don’t control which parts of their speeches the media air, the opening self-critique could be broadcast without the follow-up reasons that create the fair-minded impression, undermining or even reversing the technique’s intended effect and thus limiting its usefulness.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep