Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The author claims science is just a modern version of ancient storytelling meant to help us cope, and because it has caused social problems, it isn't actually 'true' in a complete sense.

Conclusion: Science does not achieve or provide a complete, absolute truth.

Reasoning: Science is essentially a modern myth used for coping, and its role in the breakdown of social institutions demonstrates its failure to reach total truth.

Analysis: The conclusion is found in the final sentence, introduced by the indicator 'So.' The author's primary goal is to knock science off its pedestal by equating its 'truth' to that of Homeric myths. To identify this correctly, focus on the author's ultimate claim about science's limitations rather than the supporting premises about social institutions or ancient history. The breakdown of institutions is merely the evidence used to 'demonstrate' the main point: that science falls short of truth.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

Which one of the following most accurately states the main conclusion of the essayist's argument?

Correct Answer
C
The main conclusion is that science falls short of complete truth—i.e., it is only partially true. This is explicitly signaled by “So” and supported by the subsequent evidence about societal breakdown.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep