Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Pacific waters have warmed lately, and while some blame human pollution, a climatologist points out that natural cycles also cause long-term temperature shifts, making the pollution claim questionable.

Conclusion: The claim that recent warming in Pacific coastal waters is a result of human-caused global warming is not sufficiently supported.

Reasoning: Natural cycles of ocean temperature changes can last for 60 years or more, which could account for the 15-year warming trend observed.

Analysis: This is an 'Identify the Conclusion' task, so we must isolate the author's main point. The word 'However' signals a shift away from the 'some scientists' view to the climatologist's own stance. The phrase 'this conclusion is far from justified' is the core claim being defended. The final sentence provides the evidence regarding natural cycles to support that skepticism.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

8.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion drawn in the climatologist's argument?

Correct Answer
C
C correctly captures the author’s conclusion verbatim in substance: the claim that the warming is a symptom of human-caused global warming is far from justified.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep