Passage Summary: Real visual art doesn't care about time or what order you look at things. Other arts, like music or poetry, are 'temporal' because you have to experience them in a specific order over time, even if you're just reading a poem to yourself.

Reasoning: Visual art has no fixed order or time requirement, whereas temporal art (like music or poetry) requires performance in a fixed order over time.

Analysis: This 'Must be True' question requires us to combine the definitions provided. The author defines 'truly visual art' as having no fixed order. Later, the author states that poetry *must* be experienced in a fixed order (even during silent reading). By combining these two rules, we can conclude that poetry does not qualify as a 'truly visual art form' under this definition. Look for an answer that draws a firm line between the physical appearance of an art (like written words) and its actual classification (temporal vs. visual).