WeakenDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A researcher points out that adrenaline helps us remember things better. Since fear causes adrenaline spikes, the researcher concludes that scary experiences are naturally more memorable than calm ones.

Conclusion: People generally remember the details of frightening events more clearly than those of nonfrightening events.

Reasoning: Adrenaline, which is released during fearful situations, is associated with the formation of clearer memories.

Analysis: The researcher assumes that fear is the primary or most effective way to trigger this adrenaline-based memory boost. To weaken this argument, we should look for information that suggests nonfrightening experiences could also be remembered just as clearly. Perhaps adrenaline is released in high amounts during nonfrightening excitement, or maybe fear actually introduces other factors—like panic or distraction—that hinder memory despite the adrenaline. We want to find a reason why the 'fear equals better memory' link might be broken.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher's argument?

Correct Answer
C
C weakens the argument by showing that highly pleasurable (nonfrightening) experiences also involve increased adrenaline. If many nonfrightening experiences have high adrenaline, then they too will be remembered more clearly, undermining the claim that frightening experiences are remembered more clearly than nonfrightening ones in general.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep