Library/PT 156/Sec 1/Reading Comp
Go to Platform
Reading Comprehension

Passage Breakdown

Ukhaa Tolgod is a very rich Late Cretaceous fossil site whose bones are unusually well preserved; scientists once thought sudden sandstorms buried the animals, but study of three sandstone types shows the fossils occur only in a non‑layered, pebbly deposit that looks like a wet sand avalanche (a sandslide) caused by heavy rain. Clay from dust storms can mix into dunes that are held in place by plants, preventing drainage so that unusually heavy rains can make a layer of wet sand rush down and trap animals. Because clay builds up only where vegetation stabilizes dunes, the evidence suggests the Gobi then had plants and rain, not a bare moving desert.

Logic Breakdown

Note that the sandstorm account is briefly presented and immediately dismissed; ask whether that brief treatment functions to set up a contrast with the alternative explanation developed later (the debris-flow/sandslide hypothesis).

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

26.

The author's main purpose in discussing the sandstorm hypothesis (last two sentences of the first paragraph) is to

Correct Answer
B
The author introduces the sandstorm idea only to reject it and then develops an alternative explanation. Support from the passage: 'The quality and completeness of their preservation was at first thought to have been due to immense, sudden sandstorms that buried the bodies of the animals before they could be scavenged or destroyed by exposure to the elements. However, new evidence gathered by scientists analyzing the geological formations of Ukhaa Tolgod indicates that this sandstorm hypothesis is probably mistaken.' Later discussion describes the third sandstone and an alternative mechanism: 'It is in this third type of deposit that all the vertebrate skeletal fossils of Ukhaa Tolgod are found.' 'This third type of sandstone exhibits a structure similar to that caused by a phenomenon in which an otherwise stable sand dune becomes drenched with water from heavy rains, triggering a sudden debris flow.' 'Such a debris flow at Ukhaa Tolgod in the Late Cretaceous period could have trapped whatever animals were in its path, resulting in the pristine quality of the remains.' Together these passages show the sandstorm mention is used to set up and contrast with the competing debris-flow/sandslide hypothesis developed in the rest of the passage.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep