WeakenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: An educator claims that your surroundings don't really influence whether you play sports, pointing out that kids in the same family often act differently and school sports initiatives don't work.

Conclusion: Environmental factors have a negligible impact on a teenager's decision to participate in sports.

Reasoning: Siblings within the same family often have different levels of interest in sports, and school programs aimed at encouraging participation are usually unsuccessful.

Analysis: The educator assumes that 'family life' is a monolithic environmental factor that affects all siblings identically. However, siblings often have very different experiences within the same household due to birth order, parental favoritism, or different peer groups. To weaken this argument, look for an answer that suggests environmental factors outside the family are influential, or that the family environment itself is not as uniform as the educator suggests. If external factors like friend groups or specific coaching interactions matter, the educator's dismissal of 'environment' falls apart.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the educator's argument?

Correct Answer
D
D shows that the proportion of teens who participate in sports varies greatly across societies and decades. Such large context-driven variation strongly suggests environmental factors can have a substantial impact, directly undercutting the claim that environmental factors have little effect.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep