Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Most people who take allergy pills have pet allergies. Since Chuck has a dog, he'll likely take those pills if he ends up being allergic to his dog.

Conclusion: Chuck will probably use allergy medication if he develops an allergy to pets.

Reasoning: Most pet owners who use allergy medication have pet allergies, and Chuck is a pet owner.

Analysis: This argument commits a classic error of reversing a probability. It tells us that 'Most people with Meds have Allergies' and concludes that 'If Chuck has an Allergy, he will likely have Meds.' This is like saying most people who win the lottery bought a ticket, so if you buy a ticket, you'll likely win. To find a parallel flaw, look for an answer that takes a characteristic of a specific group and incorrectly assumes that everyone with that characteristic must belong to that group.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

16.

Which one of the following arguments exhibits flawed reasoning that is most similar to that exhibited by the argument above?

Correct Answer
B
It mirrors the flaw: from “most cars taken to Acme have electrical problems” to “if a car has electrical problems, it is likely to be taken to Acme.” This reverses the probabilistic relationship just like the original.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep