WeakenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since people sitting in offices get more back injuries than people doing heavy manual labor, the author blames the office chairs and desks.

Conclusion: The design of office furniture and equipment is inadequate for protecting worker health.

Reasoning: Office workers who sit for long periods experience a higher rate of lower-back injuries than workers whose jobs involve heavy physical stress on the back.

Analysis: The author observes a higher injury rate in offices and immediately blames the furniture, but this ignores a sea of other variables. Perhaps the issue isn't the chair, but the act of sitting itself, or maybe manual laborers develop stronger muscles that protect their spines. To weaken this, look for an alternative explanation for the injury gap that has nothing to do with furniture design. If manual labor actually strengthens the back, the author's comparison between the two groups becomes much less convincing.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the reasoning above??

Correct Answer
E
E most undermines the causal leap by offering a strong alternative: consistent physical exercise is highly effective at preventing or aiding recovery from lower-back injuries. Laborers get regular physical activity, which could explain their lower injury rates without blaming office furniture.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep