Library/PT 150/Sec 1/Reading Comp
Go to Platform
Reading Comprehension

Passage Breakdown

Scientists have strong evidence that the Earth warmed by about 0.5°C in the last 100 years—more than in the previous 1,000 years. Many scientists think greenhouse gases (which trap heat) caused this. Early greenhouse models predicted more warming than we actually saw, but when researchers added the cooling effect of airborne sulfates (from volcanoes and pollution), the models matched real temperatures. Changes in the sun explain short-term ups and downs but not the long-term rise, so greenhouse gases are the best explanation for the higher long-term temperature.

Logic Breakdown

Approach: Compare the roles of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3. Paragraph 2 defends the greenhouse account by showing that, when airborne sulfates are included, greenhouse-based models produce 'theoretical temperatures for recent decades that are consistent with observed temperatures.' Paragraph 3 then evaluates an alternative (solar variability), notes that 'the models cannot account for the entirety of the recent rise in atmospheric temperature' and concludes that 'greenhouse gases represent the best explanation of that shift.' Therefore the author moves from resolving an earlier problem to tentatively accepting the greenhouse explanation after considering additional possibilities.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the relation between the argumentation in the second paragraph and that in the third paragraph?

Correct Answer
C
Paragraph 2 responds to an apparent problem with early greenhouse models by noting that 'Taking into account the varying levels of airborne sulfates ... these scientists have calculated theoretical temperatures for recent decades that are consistent with observed temperatures.' Paragraph 3 then considers an alternative explanation (solar variability), finds it inadequate ('the models cannot account for the entirety of the recent rise in atmospheric temperature' and the current rise 'surpasses the most extreme fluctuations' the solar models allow), and concludes that 'greenhouse gases represent the best explanation of that shift.' Put together, the author ends up accepting the greenhouse explanation after weighing the sulfate correction and rejecting the solar alternative—this is precisely what choice C states.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep