Must be TrueDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: To be a classic, a book has to show us something important about being human. Also, if a book isn't worth studying seriously, it won't show us those important things.

Reasoning: Literary classics must reveal something significant about the human condition, and only things worthy of serious study can reveal such significant insights.

Analysis: This stimulus provides a chain of conditional requirements. We can diagram it as: Classic -> Significant Insight -> Worthy of Serious Study. In 'Must be True' questions, we are looking for a valid inference that can be drawn from this chain. The most direct inference is that any literary classic is, by necessity, worthy of serious study. You should also be prepared to look for the contrapositive: if a book is not worthy of serious study, it cannot be a literary classic.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

If the critic's statements are true, which one of the following must also be true?

Correct Answer
B
B matches the derived chain. “Only if” means Classic -> Worthy of serious study, which follows from Classic -> Reveals and Reveal -> Worthy.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep