Reading Comprehension
Passage Breakdown
Sunlight’s ultraviolet (UV) rays can cause skin cancer, but a thin ozone layer high in the atmosphere blocks much of that harmful UV. In the 1970s scientists Mario Molina and F. Sherwood Rowland showed that common chemicals called CFCs (from spray cans and refrigerators) drift up, break apart in sunlight, and release chlorine atoms that can destroy huge numbers of ozone molecules; because so many CFCs had already built up, ozone loss would continue for years even if CFCs stopped. Their warnings were at first attacked by industry but were later confirmed by the discovery of an Antarctic “ozone hole,” which led to international bans on ozone-depleting gases and safer products.
Logic Breakdown
Approach: Identify the chain of claims linking UV to skin cancer, ozone as a UV shield, CFCs as a cause of ozone depletion, and that CFCs were regulated; infer that regulating CFCs would therefore reduce UV exposure and so indirectly lower skin-cancer incidence. Supporting sentences: By 1970 it was well established that ultraviolet light from the sun contributes to skin cancer; much of the sun's most damaging ultraviolet radiation is screened out by a thin, diffuse layer of ozone ... in the stratosphere; Molina and Rowland showed ... CFCs ... chemically attack and deplete the ozone layer, diminishing its effectiveness as a shield against ultraviolet radiation; In North America, CFCs were banned in the late 1970s.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage25.Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information in the passage?
Correct Answer
D
D is most strongly supported because the passage establishes (1) ultraviolet light contributes to skin cancer ('By 1970 it was well established that ultraviolet light from the sun contributes to skin cancer'), (2) ozone in the stratosphere screens out much of the sun's most damaging UV ('much of the sun's most damaging ultraviolet radiation is screened out by a thin, diffuse layer of ozone'), and (3) CFCs chemically deplete that ozone ('CFCs ... chemically attack and deplete the ozone layer, diminishing its effectiveness as a shield against ultraviolet radiation'). The passage also notes that CFCs were banned/regulated ('In North America, CFCs were banned in the late 1970s'), so regulating CFCs would reduce ozone depletion and thus indirectly reduce harmful UV exposure and, consequently, skin-cancer risk.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal