Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some say the government shouldn't run banks because they don't know how, but the columnist points out that leaders just need to hire the right experts, just like they do with the military.

Reasoning: Managing a bank only requires appointing senior staff, similar to how non-military politicians successfully appoint high-level military leaders.

Analysis: The columnist uses an analogy to suggest that direct expertise in a field isn't necessary for oversight, provided one can appoint the right experts. Since the stem asks which claim the columnist would reject, look for a statement that insists the government is incapable of overseeing a bank due to a lack of specialized knowledge. The argument is designed to undermine the idea that 'lack of management skill' is a dealbreaker for government intervention.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

The columnist's statements, if true, provide reason for rejecting which one of the following?

Correct Answer
D
D is correct. The columnist argues that the government can ensure proper management by appointing capable senior managers, paralleling military appointments, so it undermines the idea that government-owned banks cannot be well managed.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep