WeakenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A government official believes that because trees soak up carbon dioxide, planting a lot of them is a practical way to hit their environmental targets.

Conclusion: Planting many trees will assist the country in meeting its goal to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

Reasoning: The country is committed to lowering carbon dioxide levels, and trees are known to absorb this specific gas from the atmosphere.

Analysis: To weaken this argument, we need to find a reason why planting trees might not actually lead to a net reduction in carbon dioxide. Perhaps the process of clearing land to plant these trees releases more carbon than the trees eventually absorb, or maybe the specific trees chosen are short-lived. Look for an answer that suggests a hidden environmental cost or a biological limitation that offsets the absorption benefit.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

5.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the environment minister's argument?

Correct Answer
C
C directly undercuts the plan on the relevant metric and timeline: if soil disturbance from planting releases more CO2 than the new trees will absorb in ten years, then planting large numbers of trees would not help achieve the ten-year CO2-reduction commitment and could even make matters worse.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep