WeakenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some scientists think oil comes from ancient earth minerals, but a geologist says that's impossible because oil contains traces of life.

Conclusion: The theory that petroleum formed from deep carbon deposits rather than living organisms is incorrect.

Reasoning: Petroleum contains biomarkers, which are molecules that only come from living organisms.

Analysis: The geologist assumes that if biomarkers are in the petroleum, they must have been there from the start. To weaken this, we need to show that biomarkers could have entered the petroleum later. If petroleum formed from deep carbon and then picked up biomarkers as it migrated through layers of the crust containing fossils, the geologist's objection vanishes. Look for an answer that provides an alternative explanation for how those biological markers got into the oil.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

23.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

Correct Answer
D
If certain bacteria thrive deep in the earth’s crust, they could introduce biomarkers into petroleum irrespective of its original source. Then the presence of biomarkers no longer refutes the abiogenic theory.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep