WeakenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A study found that workers in sulfur factories are much worse at identifying smells than people in other jobs, leading researchers to conclude that sulfur fumes permanently ruin your sense of smell.

Conclusion: Long-term exposure to sulfur fumes causes lasting damage to a person's ability to smell.

Reasoning: A study showed that factory workers exposed to sulfur fumes were significantly less successful at identifying various scents than a control group of workers from other industries.

Analysis: This argument relies on a study to establish a causal link, but it leaves several doors open for attack. We could weaken it by suggesting the two groups weren't comparable to begin with, or by showing that the 'damage' wasn't actually permanent. Since this is a 'Weaken Except' question, your task is to identify the one answer choice that does NOT undermine the conclusion. Four choices will likely provide alternative causes for the poor performance or challenge the study's methodology, while the correct answer will be irrelevant or perhaps even slightly supportive.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument except:

Correct Answer
A
A does not weaken. Imperfect chemical reproductions would affect both groups similarly and do not explain the large performance difference; thus the study still supports the causal claim relative to the comparison.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep