Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Just because one can of beans is heavier than another doesn't mean you're getting more beans. Cans are full of water, and some companies might just be watering down their products to make them weigh more.

Conclusion: A heavier can of produce does not always contain a greater amount of actual food than a lighter can.

Reasoning: Canned goods are often filled with water, and dishonest companies might increase the water-to-food ratio to add weight.

Analysis: This is an 'Identify the Conclusion' question, so we are looking for the claim that the rest of the text supports. The first sentence is the thesis, while the following sentences provide the evidence regarding water weight and corporate behavior. I identified this as the conclusion because the subsequent sentences explain the mechanism behind why weight isn't a reliable indicator of food volume. It's a straightforward structure: claim followed by supporting facts.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion drawn in the consumer advocate's argument?

Correct Answer
A
A restates the main conclusion: a heavier can does not necessarily contain more food than a lighter one.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep