Must be TrueDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A president says that whenever you hire another company to make your stuff, you lose a bit of control over the quality. Their company does hire others, but only those who keep a tight grip on their own manufacturing quality.

Reasoning: Subcontracting inherently reduces the primary company's control over quality, even if the subcontractor itself maintains perfect internal control.

Analysis: We must combine the two statements to find a logical deduction. If subcontracting always leads to a loss of control, and this company does subcontract, then this company must have lost some control over the quality of those specific products. The fact that the subcontractors have 'complete control' doesn't negate the president's first rule; it just means the subcontractor is doing their best on their end while the president's company has still stepped back from the process.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the company president's statements?

Correct Answer
A
A follows: to ensure subcontractors maintain complete control (as required), the company cannot allow them to further subcontract, since further subcontracting would reduce their control.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep