WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A study found that rats eating modified potatoes got sick while others didn't, so the author thinks we shouldn't feed any modified plants to any animals.

Conclusion: Genetically modified plants should be completely excluded from animal feed.

Reasoning: A study showed that rats fed genetically modified potatoes developed health problems, while rats on a standard diet did not.

Analysis: This argument suffers from a massive overgeneralization. It takes a single study involving one type of plant (potatoes) and one type of animal (rats) and concludes that all genetically modified plants are dangerous for all animals. To weaken this, look for an answer that suggests the health issues were caused by something other than the genetic modification, or that the results of this specific study cannot be applied to other GM crops. The gap between 'these specific potatoes' and 'all GM plants' is where you should focus your attack.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

13.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

Correct Answer
A
If potatoes are not normally part of rats’ diets, then feeding GM potatoes introduces a confound (potatoes themselves or diet novelty), weakening the claim that genetic modification caused the harms and thus undermining the conclusion about excluding GM plants from animal feed.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep