Must be TrueDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Big tropical fires in 1997 were caused by a drought from El Niño, and scientists think air pollution made that El Niño particularly strong through global warming.

Reasoning: In 1997, El Niño caused a widespread drought that made the tropics susceptible to intense forest fires; additionally, many scientists link the strength of that El Niño to pollution-induced global warming.

Analysis: Since this is a 'Must be True' question, we need to find a synthesis of the provided facts without adding outside information. We can trace a causal chain: Pollution/Global Warming (potentially) -> Stronger El Niño -> Drought -> Susceptibility to Fire. We can safely infer that the 1997 fires were at least partially a result of the weather patterns caused by El Niño. Look for an answer that stays within the bounds of these relationships, likely connecting the environmental conditions of 1997 to the resulting fires.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the information above?

Correct Answer
E
E carefully follows the causal chain: if air pollution enhanced the strength of the 1997 El Niño, and that unusually strong El Niño caused the widespread drought, then air pollution contributed to the drought.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep