Reading Comprehension
Passage Breakdown
Calvaria major is a tree that used to be common on Mauritius, where the dodo lived and died out centuries ago. In 1977 Temple saw only old trees and guessed that after the dodo disappeared the tree stopped reproducing because its seeds need the dodo’s gizzard to wear down their hard pits before they can sprout. He offered some tests (estimating gizzard force and feeding pits to turkeys, with a few sprouts) as support. But later experts found many younger Calvaria trees and showed that some seeds can germinate without bird abrasion, so Temple’s dodo-dependence idea is doubtful and the tree’s decline could be from disease or introduced animals instead.
Logic Breakdown
Read the sentence containing 'semblance of rigor' and the sentences that follow in the same paragraph; determine whether the author means Temple's evidence genuinely proved his hypothesis or only gave the appearance of scientific support.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage24.In saying that Temple's supporting evidence lent his argument a "semblance of rigor" (first sentence of the third paragraph), the author most likely intends to indicate that
Correct Answer
D
D is correct. The author uses 'semblance of rigor' to say that Temple presented measurement-based experimental results that made his hypothesis look scientifically supported but did not amount to direct proof. Support from the passage: 'Although direct proof was unattainable, Temple did offer some additional findings in support of his hypothesis, which lent his argument a "semblance of rigor."' The next sentences enumerate quantitative steps Temple took: 'From studies of other birds, he estimated the abrasive force generated within a dodo's gizzard.' 'Based on this estimate and on test results determining the crush-resistant strength of Calvaria major pits, he concluded that the pits could probably have withstood a cycle through a dodo's gizzard.' 'He also fed Calvaria major pits to turkeys, and though many of the pits were destroyed, ten emerged, abraded yet intact. Three of these sprouted when planted, which he saw as vindicating his hypothesis.' Those details show experimental, quantitative evidence that only superficially bolstered credibility; the immediately following paragraph (noting that specialists strongly challenged Temple's proposals) makes clear the evidence was not conclusive. Thus D best captures the author's intended meaning.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal