Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: An economist explains that when people get richer, they pollute more by buying things like cars, and when the economy slows down, pollution levels drop.

Conclusion: Economic prosperity is a primary factor causing the increase in carbon dioxide emissions responsible for global warming.

Reasoning: As people earn more, they buy energy-intensive items like cars, and historical data shows that carbon dioxide levels drop significantly during economic recessions.

Analysis: This is a classic 'Identify the Conclusion' task where the first sentence sets the stage and the subsequent sentences provide the 'how' (mechanism) and the 'proof' (empirical evidence). The word 'Also' in the final sentence confirms that the recession data is a secondary premise supporting the initial claim. When identifying the conclusion here, focus on the most general claim that the other statements are intended to prove, rather than the specific examples of cars or recessions.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

Which one of the following most accurately states the overall conclusion drawn in the economist's argument?

Correct Answer
B
It captures the economist’s main point: prosperity is an important cause of increases in CO2 emissions, a claim supported by the rise-with-income and fall-with-recession evidence.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep