WeakenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The Johnsons are trying to decide between growing peaches or apricots. Peaches are cheaper to start with and produce fruit faster, and since both sell well, the argument says peaches are the winner.

Conclusion: Planting peach trees is a more sensible choice for the Johnsons than planting apricot trees.

Reasoning: While both fruits are equally popular in the area, peach trees are cheaper to buy and plant, and they produce fruit at an earlier age than apricot trees.

Analysis: The argument focuses entirely on the initial costs and the speed of the first harvest. To weaken this, look for an answer that introduces a long-term disadvantage for peaches or a significant long-term benefit for apricots. For example, if apricot trees live twice as long or produce ten times as much fruit over their lifespan, the initial savings on peach trees would be irrelevant. The tutor's advice: find a hidden cost that makes the 'cheaper' option more expensive in the long run.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

1.

Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument?

Correct Answer
A
Showing that locally grown apricots sell at a much higher price directly challenges the assumption that cheaper, earlier-bearing peach trees are the better economic choice. If apricots command a significant price premium, their higher initial costs and later fruiting could easily be offset, weakening the conclusion that peaches make more sense.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep