WeakenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Robert wants year-round school to increase learning; Samantha counters that since the total number of days doesn't change, no extra learning will happen. Robert needs a way to show that the schedule itself, not just the number of days, improves learning.

Conclusion: The school board should adopt a year-round academic schedule to allow teachers to cover more material.

Reasoning: Samantha argues the schedule won't help because the total number of school days remains the same due to frequent breaks.

Analysis: To counter Samantha, Robert needs to show that 'total days' isn't the only variable that matters for covering material. If students forget a significant amount of information over a long three-month summer, teachers must spend the first few weeks of every year reviewing old material. A year-round schedule with shorter breaks might reduce this 'summer slide,' meaning teachers spend less time reviewing and more time on new material. Look for an answer that highlights the efficiency or retention benefits of shorter, more frequent breaks.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

9.

Which one of the following, if true, is a response Robert could make that would counter Samantha's argument?

Correct Answer
D
D shows that after short breaks teachers spend almost no time reviewing, whereas after a three-month summer they may spend up to a month on review. That means redistributing breaks increases effective time for new material even if the number of days is the same, directly countering Samantha’s day-count claim and supporting Robert’s point.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep